data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e323/7e323c5cd18aef49c2990580c08744516146b695" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e323/7e323c5cd18aef49c2990580c08744516146b695" alt=""
The use of machine learning (Ml) for credit risk analysis has sparked a lively debate. Ml refers to a set of heterogeneous techniques, and one should not treat them all in the same way, since the most consolidated and stable approaches guarantee a high level of transparency and a low risk of overfitting. They can be used for regulatory capital calculation purposes, but may also serve broader purposes: reducing costs, shortening response times, strengthening credit monitoring, improving distribution channels and cementing customer relationships. Discouraging their use can put banks at a disadvantage vis à vis their most innovative competitors, making supervision less effective.
Interested in this paper?
Buy the issue